[38261] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: C&W Peering Problem?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Fri Jun 1 17:47:03 2001
Date: 1 Jun 2001 14:45:29 -0700
Message-ID: <20010601214529.20204.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
X-Sent-From: sean@donelan.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 01 June 2001, "Scott Patterson" wrote:
> Point C says 2:1, but D says they don't care in which direction
> its in, it just has to be balanced.
I wonder how is the end of reciprocal compensation going to affect
large dial modem pool providers (e.g. UUNET, Genuity). Should UUNET
compensate the LEC for all that inbound traffic to their modem pools
at a few cents per minute. Obviously the traffic is extremely
imbalanced, so why should UUNET get a free ride on the LEC's network?
