[38241] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: C&W Peering Problem?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Diaz)
Fri Jun 1 14:39:33 2001
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p04320408b73d8fcfcff1@[172.138.57.166]>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.21.0106011414180.6797-100000@harbor.gaslightmedia.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:35:43 -0400
To: Charles Scott <cscott@gaslightmedia.com>, nanog@merit.edu
From: David Diaz <davediaz@iwcinc.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I was wondering when this issue was going to be brought up. C&W
dropped peering with several backbones. I will bet the problems
started about a week ago. It might beg an interesting question. If
a tier1 drops enough other backbones that are non-transit buyers....
doesnt that mean that the tier1 is no longer tier1??? Seems that C&W
no longer has full routes.
Considering that they have been shopping for a buyer of the company,
I would guess to say this administrative more affects their share
value... doesnt it.
dd
At 2:25 PM -0400 6/1/01, Charles Scott wrote:
>All:
> Just got off the phone with C&W's NOC trying to find out why NASA.GOV
>had fallen off the edge of the earth. When I asked if this had anything to
>do with the C&W peering policy, the answer was yes. Does anyone have any
>more information on this?
>
>Chuck
