[38196] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: More BW, Less Taxes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Albert Meyer)
Wed May 30 15:13:00 2001
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010530103343.00dfc4a0@mail.waller.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 14:12:11 -0500
To: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
From: Albert Meyer <albert@waller.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.33.0105292358250.1204-100000@neon>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 11:59 PM 5/29/01 -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>Fooey!
Haven't heard that technical term lately. Barry!
> > If you're across an ocean from the US, you have to factor in the cost of
> > running underwater cable.
>
>If that is the case, why is it almost the same cost, if not more
>expensive, to get a LA<>NY OC3 then a NY<>LND STM1?
Underwater cable isn't the only factor, and probably isn't the primary
factor, but it is a factor. When you're across the ocean, other factors +
UWCable > other factors alone.
