[38108] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: QOS or more bandwidth
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Irwin Lazar)
Tue May 29 10:35:18 2001
Message-ID: <0C875DC28791D21192CD00104B95BFE70146DC53@BGSLC02>
From: Irwin Lazar <ILazar@tbg.com>
To: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 08:15:38 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
FWIW, I recently heard someone ask the question - "how do you go to your
investors and tell them you need more money for more bandwidth because you
don't want to efficiently manage your existing capacity?"
This is the business case for QoS, IMHO.
Irwin
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Donelan [mailto:sean@donelan.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:18 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: QOS or more bandwidth
While its generally more effective to add more bandwidth than rationing
it with QOS, with the recent downturn in capital markets will QOS become
more popular? If your budget for bandwidth has been cut, I'm not sure
people will have any budget for QOS either. But what QOS features are
included in the standard product offerings?
