[38092] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: QOS or more bandwidth
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fletcher E Kittredge)
Tue May 29 09:02:28 2001
Message-Id: <200105291301.f4TD12n16124@smtp.gwi.net>
To: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "28 May 2001 23:17:46 PDT."
<20010529061746.8682.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 09:01:02 -0400
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@dargo.gwi.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 28 May 2001 23:17:46 -0700 Sean Donelan wrote:
> While its generally more effective to add more bandwidth than rationing
> it with QOS, with the recent downturn in capital markets will QOS become
> more popular?
You are asking for projections in a scenerio where bandwidth
demand drops, and bandwidth supply remains constant or grows.
Projection: Bandwidth prices are dropping. QOS still sucks.
regards,
fletcher
