[37902] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Stealth Blocking
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Fri May 25 13:52:16 2001
Message-ID: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F0922860E4697@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'Shawn McMahon' <smcmahon@eiv.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:05:53 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
The original message never made that distinction.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn McMahon [mailto:smcmahon@eiv.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:30 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Stealth Blocking
>
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:04:34PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote:
> >
> > And, as a business we wouldn't divert you. This is only a
> solution for
> > Resi accounts.
>
> You do realize, I assume, that if somebody thinks he's sending email
> directly to a certain server, and you divert it to another server,
> you're intercepting it under the terms of the Electronic
> Communications
> Privacy Act of 1986?
>
> That's allowed if it's necessary to provide the service, but good luck
> winning on that argument with the plaintiffs trotting out
> witnesses stating
> it's not necessary, just your choice.
>
>
