[37880] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Stealth Blocking
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Slagle)
Fri May 25 09:08:53 2001
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:06:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jason Slagle <raistlin@tacorp.net>
To: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20010525072950.A16908@eiv.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0105250906140.7923-100000@mail.tacorp.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Actually I was unaware. Maybe I need to rethink that :)
Jason
--
Jason Slagle - CCNP - CCDP
Network Administrator - Toledo Internet Access - Toledo Ohio
- raistlin@tacorp.net - jslagle@toledolink.com - WHOIS JS10172
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign . If dreams are like movies then memories
X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . are films about ghosts..
/ \ - NO Word docs in e-mail . - Adam Duritz - Counting Crows
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:04:34PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote:
> >
> > And, as a business we wouldn't divert you. This is only a solution for
> > Resi accounts.
>
> You do realize, I assume, that if somebody thinks he's sending email
> directly to a certain server, and you divert it to another server,
> you're intercepting it under the terms of the Electronic Communications
> Privacy Act of 1986?
>
> That's allowed if it's necessary to provide the service, but good luck
> winning on that argument with the plaintiffs trotting out witnesses stating
> it's not necessary, just your choice.
>
>
