[37871] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Stealth Blocking
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Fri May 25 07:32:47 2001
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 07:29:50 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010525072950.A16908@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0105241956440.7923-100000@mail.tacorp.net>; from raistlin@tacorp.net on Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:04:34PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:04:34PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote:
>=20
> And, as a business we wouldn't divert you. This is only a solution for
> Resi accounts.
You do realize, I assume, that if somebody thinks he's sending email
directly to a certain server, and you divert it to another server,
you're intercepting it under the terms of the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act of 1986?
That's allowed if it's necessary to provide the service, but good luck
winning on that argument with the plaintiffs trotting out witnesses stating
it's not necessary, just your choice.
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjsOQi4ACgkQEcl9bQ0RMt1iZACeO67LTIDbTLJaIKs9d8JQiKmB
TYAAn3mhYbzyJuK3jIuJSejszl3ayfpU
=yI2O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--
