|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:33:27 -0700 (PDT) From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com> To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> Cc: <nanog@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <NCBBLIEPOCNJOAEKBEAKCEEFPCAA.davids@webmaster.com> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105181328220.6059-100000@catbert.rellim.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu Yo David! On Fri, 18 May 2001, David Schwartz wrote: > regardless of the price. There is absolutely no rational defense for this > ruling that I can imagine, and with no bargaining power, the utilities were > raped by the generators. Without the high prices companies like Kaiser Aluminum would not have sent 7,000 workers home so they could sell their power to California. Like it or not, the higher prices did make more energy available to California than would have been otherwise the case. RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701 gem@rellim.com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |