[37626] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Stability of the Internet?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Allen Simpson)
Fri May 18 13:56:09 2001
Message-ID: <3B05616C.8DFD845D@greendragon.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:53:16 -0400
From: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="------------3B5E25E8D8649E27C44368CC"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------3B5E25E8D8649E27C44368CC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I think you can put that down as _definitely_ a troll....
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@earthlink.net>
To: <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<langdell@technologist.com>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to technologist-com.mr.outblaze.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<langdell@technologist.com>
<<< 550 5.7.1 <langdell@technologist.com>... Relaying denied
550 <langdell@technologist.com>... User unknown
--------------3B5E25E8D8649E27C44368CC
Content-Type: message/delivery-status;
name="nsmail4"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="nsmail4"
Reporting-MTA: dns; harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net
Received-From-MTA: DNS; dialup-166.90.225.214.Dial1.Detroit1.Level3.net
Arrival-Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Final-Recipient: RFC822; langdell@technologist.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; technologist-com.mr.outblaze.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.7.1 <langdell@technologist.com>... Relaying denied
Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
--------------3B5E25E8D8649E27C44368CC
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
name="nsmail5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="nsmail5"
Received: from greendragon.com (dialup-166.90.225.214.Dial1.Detroit1.Level3.net [166.90.225.214])
by harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20787;
Fri, 18 May 2001 10:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3B055589.F96B60C4@greendragon.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:02:19 -0400
From: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
Organization: DayDreamer
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Stability of the Internet?
References: <20010518093405.23493.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net><8766eyeogv.fsf@valhalla.seastrom.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20010518112217.052de7b8@babyblue.boii.com> <027701c0dfb3$2b37ef80$0200a8c0@Magnus>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Based on the email address, this was probably a troll.
We're Sorry, but you can no longer log in via the technologist.com hostname.
Please log in at http://www.iname.com from now on.
We regret any inconvenience this may have caused you. Thank you for stopping by.
Anyway, the fact that some of us now block BGP acceptance for the
new.net blocks, because it causes us support costs, would be an
argument that the Internet is less "stable".
"Tim Langdell, PhD" wrote:
>
> Yes, I was asking specifically about "stability" (with a request that
> someone perhaps try to explain what that might mean other than a term to
> scare people with) rather than "compatibility". BTW, I don't think ".house"
> is a New.net TLD ;-)
>
--------------3B5E25E8D8649E27C44368CC--
