[37544] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Tue May 15 13:07:59 2001
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 13:05:16 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010515130516.B3063@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <NDBBKECCEHKIHGIMJECAGEGNCJAA.vivienm@dyndns.org>; from vivienm@dyndns.org on Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:52:00PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:52:00PM -0400, Vivien M. wrote:
>=20
> but...). Now, if 1.2.3.4 has proper matching forward/reverse DNS lookups,=
I
> don't see how people behind someone else's NAT pose a problem.
Remember, we're talking about matching hostnames to reverse lookups.
Assuming you're using NAPT (a specific subset of NAT that seems to be
what we're talking about here), this won't match up unless all your
boxes have the same hostname.
--mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjsBYcwACgkQEcl9bQ0RMt1I9wCgvyLN+OIQxkBLApACRrmW5Nfx
g0MAnR3bsRaBQjFI5VcncgGP4q6dWUpT
=xxSx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t--
