[37307] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Instant chats and central servers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cerqua, Toby)
Tue May 8 19:48:43 2001
Message-ID: <B1A9AEECE563D211893F0080AD30E2F42B25C5@pegasus>
From: "Cerqua, Toby" <tcerqua@platinumsystems.net>
To: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 16:44:36 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On a partially related topic, I've recently run across a service that tries
to put all the instant messenging services together in one package. Check
out Jabber.com; it's still under development, but it seems like it may be a
good idea in the making. Redundancy in messengers may be useful, but the
program's still a teeny bit buggy.
On 5/8/2001 at 11:35:27 -0700, Sean Donelan wroteified:
>
> A question (and a test to see if I'm still subscribed)
>
> The various instant messenging services, such as AIM, ICQ, Microsoft,
> Yahoo, other Messenger uses a central server to manage "presence".
>
> No central server appears to mean no instant messages, am I correct?
>
> What does this have to do with NANOG, apparently it is becoming more
> common for backbone NOC folks to communicate with their friends in
> other NOCs via one of these instant chat programs. I didn't realize
> how common it was until I was informed about it last month when AOL/AIM
> had difficulties. This month Yahoo Messenger had power difficulties,
> which disrupted their central servers.
>
> If folks are using this these services for real-time communications,
> should we be trying to improve their reliability? Or is this just a
> "feature" of how presence services work.
>
>
--
Dave Israel
Senior Manager, IP Backbone
Intermedia Business Internet
