[37225] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (M. David Leonard)
Mon May 7 18:12:28 2001

Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 16:46:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: "M. David Leonard" <mdl@equinox.shaysnet.com>
To: Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell@martin.fl.us>
Cc: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>,
	"'Fletcher E Kittredge'" <fkittred@dargo.gwi.net>,
	"'Charles Sprickman'" <spork@inch.com>,
	Steve Sobol <sjsobol@NorthShoreTechnologies.net>,
	"Joseph T. Klein" <jtk@titania.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010507140203.26715B-100000@da1server>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.10105071646.A10919-0100000@equinox.shaysnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Greg-

	Maybe you feel comfortable with the extent of regulation you see 
(or think you see) in Florida but after a few years on the cable 
advisory board in Greenfield, Massachusetts, I can tell you that there is 
no effective regulation here.  I seriously doubt that there is meaningful 
cable regulation anywhere but I am willing to be corrected.  At least in 
Massachusetts, cable advisory boards are a sick joke.



					David Leonard
					ShaysNet


On Mon, 7 May 2001, Greg Maxwell wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 7 May 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> > Cable operators are unregulated local monopolies.
> 
> No. They are regulated, by the franchise agreement. If the agreement isn't
> strong enough to ensure the highest best use of public right-of-way then
> it's a failure of the local government for not making it so (or the
> state/FCC for forbiding the local governments from placing certain
> requirements in the agreement).
> 
> It appears that there is a lot of shooting from the hip going on here.
> cable regulation is fraught with legal complications and is changing
> rapidly right now, and the layman anaysis going on here isn't doing the
> topic justice.
> 
> It's additionally complicated by the fact that the laws differ from state
> to state. In Florida, it's covered by Sec. 166.046, Florida Statutes and
> the Communications Act of 1934, the Cable Communications Policy Act of
> 1984, the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of
> 1992, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
> 
> If there is any intrest, I believe that Martin County (Fl)'s 1999
> agreement with Adelphia is online someplace, I could track down a
> URL for it.
> 
> 
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post