[37198] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Albert Meyer)
Mon May 7 12:21:04 2001

Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010507110625.00dba8f0@mail.waller.net>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 11:16:25 -0500
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Albert Meyer <albert@waller.net>
In-Reply-To: <p05100c00b71b3eaacb5a@[209.207.60.21]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Didn't UUNet try this back in 96? A quick search of Boardwatch failed to 
find the article, but ISTR that John Sidgemore eventually slunk back to the 
playground and agreed to play nice. If UUNet couldn't pull it off back 
then, I doubt that CW can now. Things have changed a lot in 5 years, but I 
would suspect that "Stealing the Internet" would now be harder rather than 
easier.

At 01:31 PM 5/6/01 -0500, Joseph T. Klein wrote:
>It seems to be worthy of note that AGIS and PSI tried to use the
>"pay me don't peer" card before they deteriorated.



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post