[37122] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: terminal server recommendation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (just me.)
Tue May 1 18:52:25 2001
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 14:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: "just me." <matt@camel.ethereal.net>
Reply-To: matt@snark.net
To: Aaron Dewell <acd@woods.net>
Cc: Charles Smith <chasmith9@hotmail.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0105011446560.7684-100000@spruce.woods.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105011454010.61984-100000@camel.ethereal.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I've been completely happy with our installation of PM25's. They are
getting harder to find/more expensive, though. Lucent really blew it
EOL'ing these.
We have ~100 in production and aside from an occasonal DOA they've
been frawless. BBNPlanet also used them exclusively for console access
when I was there.
matto
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Aaron Dewell wrote:
If you can find them, Livingston/Lucent PM-25s work pretty well too and are
cheap (since they are discontinued).
Aaron
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Charles Smith wrote:
> I would like to deploy a terminal server in several of my POPs, however cost
> is a slight issue. Can anyone on the list recommend a fairly inexpensive
> terminal server (besides Cisco)? Obviously the terminal server should be
> reliable and work - it is the little things that count.
>
> chas
--mghali@snark.net------------------------------------------<darwin><
Flowers on the razor wire/I know you're here/We are few/And far
between/I was thinking about her skin/Love is a many splintered
thing/Don't be afraid now/Just walk on in. #include <disclaim.h>
