[37098] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: black hat .cn networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Tue May 1 08:15:43 2001
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 08:03:56 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010501080356.A17544@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10104302356360.20602-100000@guinness.digisle.com>; from scott@digisle.net on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:07:48AM +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:07:48AM +0000, scott w wrote:
>=20
>=20
> "The point of the planned hack-attacks is to encourage the people of
> the U.S to protest against their government and demand peace between=
=20
> nations, the hackers said."
When in reality, people in the US break down into four categories:
1) Those who don't care, and don't understand. They don't care.
2) Those who don't care, and do understand. They're filtering .cn.
3) Those who care, and don't understand. They want us to retaliate.
4) Those who care, and understand. They're retaliating.
Notice none of these involve protesting the US government not making
nicey-nice with China. Considering the fact that they've recently gotten
Most Favored Nation trade status, is there anybody left in the US who
doesn't think we're being nice enough to China?
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE67qYsEcl9bQ0RMt0RAuhlAJ9flu1Jd55/IFGPvO8WBIxVCRMKrACgtWwv
R8NC5dtLWUGEfWGLec4B1vc=
=MojF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--
