[37079] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: black hat .cn networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Mon Apr 30 23:55:41 2001
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
To: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010430195255.B16721@eiv.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104301824240.12465-100000@anime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 06:39:56PM -0400, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
> > Oh for the love of god, 15 web sites get defaced and it's suddenly worth
> > trying to deny internet access to a billion people?
> Really; statistically, it'd make more sense to block .com and .net.
or statistically basing the blocks on networks which actually do something
once notified.
right now it seems to be an average of 25% response (which is pathetic),
whereas to .cn sites its around 0%
-Dan
