[37056] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: black hat .cn networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Mon Apr 30 19:14:49 2001
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1041425782.988673214@[169.254.25.186]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104301532340.8908-100000@anime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Alex Bligh wrote:
> I just love the way (some) Americans bleat about their
> supposed constitutional rights to have their packets
> passed between any given pair of networks, but (perhaps
> others) are quite happy to route-map out entire
> subcontinents on the basis there might be a few
> (i.e. statistically insignificant number of)
> trouble makers there...
AS4134 is totally black hat. 100% rogue and haven for spammers and
crackers.
They have a bogus replybot which gives automated bullshit excuses to abuse
reports.
> Somehow I just can't imagine someone suggesting AOL / Earthlink
> (& I've seen plenty of 'interesting' packets
> from there) are blackholed for the same reason
> would get away with this on NANOG.
because aol/earthlink actually bother to respond to abuse reports (albeit
slowly).
AS4134 basically tells you to fuck off and eat your spam and tolerate
their script kiddies.
-Dan
