[37053] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: black hat .cn networks

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George William Herbert)
Mon Apr 30 18:46:43 2001

Message-Id: <200104302232.PAA06787@gw.retro.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Cc: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:32:05 -0700
From: George William Herbert <gherbert@retro.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



Is it worthwhile to bother given the low rate and
relatively low proficiency of attacks so far?

They're trying to make a statement, sure, and doing
some vandalism in the process.  But it doesn't appear
from any firsthand reports I have or news reports
I've seen so far that any serious damage has
been done anywhere.  Dropping a country due to
annoyance is a pretty serious step.  If their
ministry were directly encouraging all out serious
attacks that would be a different thing, but I don't
see any justification to do anything yet.

Feel free to correct above impression of damage if
you have better info than I do so far.


-george william herbert
gherbert@retro.com



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post