[36892] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: RIP and RIPv2, "The glue that makes the internet work"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Tue Apr 24 22:10:35 2001

Message-ID: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039ED7@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: "'John M . Brown'" <jmbrown@ihighway.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:08:20 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


That was last month's issue. I chuckled too. But, for a small end-point LAN,
it's not bad. Consider it appropriate tech, applied in appropriate places.
Even fully static routes aren't bad, on small enough networks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John M . Brown [mailto:jmbrown@ihighway.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 6:51 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RIP and RIPv2, "The glue that makes the internet work"
> 
> 
> 
> Latest Linux Mag has this really nice long article about how
> RIP and its new version RIPv2 is the GLUE that makes the internet
> work.  
> 
> I almost fell down on that.
> 
> Oh, wait, I do know a couple of exchange points that wanted to or are
> running RIP.  No REALLY!!
> 
> jmbrown
> 
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post