[36693] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Qwest (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Sat Apr 14 20:55:10 2001
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 20:52:35 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010414205235.D21917@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.32.0104141529550.19052-100000@shell.xecu.net>; from andy@xecu.net on Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:31:11PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:31:11PM -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
>=20
> Numerous noc addresses across the net have received it. Maybe not all at
> once, as part of one large mailing, but it is most definitely a sustained
> effort.
Ok, but I still say it's not a burden on the net if they're sending it out
manually to one person at a time.
As for it being a burden on your time, it's far less so than if they came
to your office to speak to you directly, or called you, and those are
not responded to with nearly the vehemence (and sometimes violence) of
email.
For God's sake, you don't have to hang up a phone, or escort someone to a
door here; you just hit "delete" and go on.
--DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE62PDTEcl9bQ0RMt0RAiyeAKChMrUF3cyU9CXIqHRx+HQ2jI8XNQCfWshD
gNpv880JEzghV0FskfIIE1c=
=3xEy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi--
