[36420] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AS Leakage
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Darrin Walton)
Wed Apr 4 22:38:22 2001
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 02:33:31 +0000
From: Darrin Walton <darrinw@nixc.net>
To: John Fraizer <nanog@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>
Cc: Darrin Walton <darrinw@nixc.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010405023330.F65392@mfnx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0104042221430.16296-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>; from nanog@Overkill.EnterZone.Net on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:25:38PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
|+ Did I say I didn't believe it? I said I didn't realize he worked for
|+ exodus. Had I known that, I wouldn't have suggested that if he filters
|+ _701_ from his other connections, he would lose 701 connectivity in the
|+ event that his 701 connection went down.
Are we done trying to show off our regex skills?
|+ There is nothing wrong on my side. We're not a direct peer of 701. I
|+ never said I did. I do have paths into 701 however. You didn't specify
|+ direct 701_13944.
Maybe you the one who does not understand the English language
very well. Let me show you the original question I asked:
|$ So, you were under the belief that a rather large service
|$ provider, only had one connection to UUNet? How many paths do you,
|$ yourself have into UU? Are they anything > DS3?
Your response:
|+ As for paths into 701, we three. All of them > DS3.
Caught in a lie, and trying to cover our ass now? Did not think people
would remember what was posted, less than an hour ago? How stupid do you
take us for?
I think we can end this thread now. As you can see, you are just making
yourself look worse, than you already do.
--
darrin walton, darrinw@nixc.net
