[36375] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Faster 'Net growth rate raises fears about routers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Wed Apr 4 05:08:01 2001
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010404104918.00ab9930@max.ibm.net.il>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 11:00:28 +0200
To: Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com>, nanog@merit.edu
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010404070729.056fb6a0@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 07:11 04/04/01 +1000, Philip Smith wrote:
It may also be the concerted effort of certain individuals who have been
after the top 10-30 non-CIDRers. I know I have sent out dozens of emails
to those ASes since Jan 1 and have gotten, in general, a positive response
and many have fixed their systems.
-Hank
>If you look at the graphs though, the routing table growth stopped around
>the end of the year. I've seen 101k prefixes give or take a few hundred in
>my view since 31st December.... Also, the number of /24s being announced
>has stopped growing. It's been 58k5 for the last 3 months...
>
>Routing table growth is following the state of the Internet economies?
>Looks like it to me.
>
>philip
>--
>
>At 13:15 02/04/2001 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
>>I have a feeling this one may start another very large NANOG thread:
>>
>>http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0402routing.html
>>
>>-Hank
>>
>
