[36317] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Faster 'Net growth rate raises fears about routers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Mon Apr 2 18:14:25 2001
Message-ID: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039DB4@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'Bill Woodcock' <woody@zocalo.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:14:40 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> From: Bill Woodcock [mailto:woody@zocalo.net]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 2:51 PM
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> > From what I just went through (DSLnetworks v Covad),
> this is straight
> > bulldust. Had I been properly multi-homed, MHSC would
> NOT have been down for
> > 5 weeks.
>
> Patrik said ISPs, not IAPs.
So, please explain to me how not being multi-homed is anything other than a
bad-thing and high-risk? No, I am not including colo, because it is assumed
that you know what their arrangements are before you "buy". Reputable colos
are multi-homed, in spades.
