[36314] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Faster 'Net growth rate raises fears about routers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Mon Apr 2 17:36:38 2001
Message-ID: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039DB2@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'Hank Nussbacher' <hank@att.net.il>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 14:35:08 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
From the article:
<quote>
"Half of the companies that are multihomed should have gotten better service
from their providers," says Patrik Faltstrom, a Cisco engineer and co-chair
of the IETF's Applications Area. "ISPs haven't done a good enough job
explaining to their customers that they don't need to multihome."
</quote>
From what I just went through (DSLnetworks v Covad), this is straight
bulldust. Had I been properly multi-homed, MHSC would NOT have been down for
5 weeks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hank Nussbacher [mailto:hank@att.net.il]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 4:16 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Faster 'Net growth rate raises fears about routers
>
>
>
> I have a feeling this one may start another very large NANOG thread:
>
> http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0402routing.html
>
> -Hank
>
>
