[36095] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ITU / UN (was: Multiple Roots...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Havard Eidnes)
Mon Mar 26 12:11:55 2001
To: woods@weird.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Havard Eidnes <he@nordu.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 18 Mar 2001 15:47:04 -0500 (EST)"
<20010318204704.40B8D8C@proven.weird.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <20010326190839L.he@runit.no>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:08:39 +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> > In other words, we need an authorized international body with
> > the clout to oversee the whole mess. But then, isn't that
> > what ICANN is supposed to be? (Or would you rather have the
> > ITU oversee the Internet?)
>
> some days I'd rather have the UN do it... :-)
Well, the end result would probably be the same. To quote
http://www.itu.int/aboutitu/history/history.html
(...)
In 1947, after the Second World War, the ITU held a conference
with the aim of developing and modernizing the organization.
Under an agreement with the United Nations, it became a
specialized agency of the United Nations on 15 October 1947
(...)
So... If you think choosing ITU as the governing body would be bad,
it might be wise to be careful what else you wish for.
Regards,
- H=E5vard
