[36029] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Golding)
Thu Mar 22 11:58:42 2001
From: "Daniel Golding" <dan@netrail.net>
To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:38:13 -0500
Message-ID: <FHEBKELAPEKHCBCFIEBBCEHMCCAA.dan@netrail.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-reply-to: <E14g7w1-0004iK-00@roam.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
My mistake. However, the statements:
We accept /20 and shorter in the 24/8, 61/8, 63/8, 64/8, 65/8, and 66/8
address space
In the traditional Class C space (i.e., 192/3), we accept /24 and shorter.
in Verio's routing policy, effectivly means that folks issues /20s by RIR's
will have no problem routing them, which was actually my point. With RIR's
issueing space in 0/1, most providers filter at /20 or /24 boundaries there.
Obviously, a few providers like Verio are more granular.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:28 AM
> To: Daniel Golding
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
>
>
> > I am unaware of ANY service provider who filters on /19s
> anymore, excepting
> > old Class B space ...
>
> http://info.us.bb.verio.net/
>
