[35992] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Mandatory One Reply To This Weeks: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Wed Mar 21 02:08:45 2001
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010321090106.00aaf440@max.ibm.net.il>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:03:52 +0200
To: Aleksi Suhonen <nanog-poster@axu.tm>, nanog@merit.edu,
eof-list@ripe.net, apops@apnic.net, routing-wg@ripe.net
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>
In-Reply-To: <20010320094624.7133B1A2BF@tikka.axu.tm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 11:46 20/03/01 +0200, Aleksi Suhonen wrote:
My email on Feb 1 to as1221@telstra.net, David.Woodgate@telstra.net,
paull@telstra.net, gih@telstra.net has gone unanswered. Even a reply of
"we don't care or we have our reasons" would have been better than no
answer at all.
-Hank
>Hello,
>
>Quote from "The Cidr Report":
>} ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description
>} AS1221 1594 1194 400 25.1% Telstra Pty Ltd
>} AS226 149 93 56 37.6% Los Nettos
>
>Seeing the same few big providers in the report each week is
>of course disheartening, but seeing these two stay on the list
>is in my opinion even worse through disillusionment.
>
>Telstra because they themselves give the impression of caring
>about the global routing table size by maintaining the graph
>of its growth over the years.
>
>And Los Nettos / ISI because they give the impression of being
>a sort of authority on networking know-how by associating
>themselves with several related services and projects.
>
>--
> Aleksi Suhonen
