[35946] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Mon Mar 19 17:36:34 2001
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:24:57 -0500
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010319152457.D24847@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+B+y8wtTXqdUj1xM"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010319003307.D229@virtualis.com>; from scott@virtualis.com on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:33:07AM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--+B+y8wtTXqdUj1xM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:33:07AM -0800, Scott Francis wrote:
>=20
> yes, and multiple directory services are a great thing. However, when I d=
ial
> +1.310.642.0351 it reaches the same number no matter where the call
> originates, in what phone network, who my LD carrier is, who my local tel=
co
> is, or how many switches it passes through on the way.
On my phone I get an error if I dial that.
I have to dial something else first to tell it that I'm looking for a
number that's not on my local phone network, but instead on the one
Bellsouth participates in.
--+B+y8wtTXqdUj1xM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6tmsZEcl9bQ0RMt0RArmaAJ0fSxDx1Q206p55I3gk/f0K2b8peQCfaAay
rESbJVxaldurzZ0UB6XAqOs=
=JEjN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+B+y8wtTXqdUj1xM--
