[35800] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Gee, operational content: IPv6 routing issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dee McKinney)
Fri Mar 16 02:01:34 2001
From: Dee McKinney <deem@wdm.com>
Message-Id: <200103160455.f2G4tPI08660@papa.wdm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 19:55:20 -0900 (AKST)
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20010315202030.A17947@alcantara.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Tim,
I remember the question, and thought it deserved more of informed reply at the time.
Most people I ask about this subject say it's still in test bed provisioning and unless
some company big enough to spur other large fish to bite, it will never take off.
2 cents Randy ? :-)
Timothy Brown <tcb@ga.prestige.net> wrote:
>
> At the last NANOG, I asked a question regarding issues with prefix growth and
> routing policies as we transition to IPv6. The answer I was given was that
> IPv6 had several issues wrt adoption from the community. Can someone provide
> pointers on where these issues were discussed and what material I could read
> to shed light on these issues, without the time necessary to make a thorough
> analysis of the IPv6 protocol and associated routing protocol efforts?
>
> What are the most troubling issues with IPv6 that members of the community
> have noticed?
>
> Best,
> Tim
>
