[35741] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Thu Mar 15 12:35:51 2001
Message-ID: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039CC7@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'Stephen Stuart' <stuart@mfnx.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:22:52 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> From: Stephen Stuart [mailto:stuart@mfnx.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 8:53 AM
>
> > IIRC, there was an "issue" around the assignment of
> 16.1.16.1; I don't
> > think lawyers had been invented back then, so the scope of
> the scandal
> > remained relatively small.
> >
> > (The coolness factor was the binary representation, of course.)
>
> Sorry, it was the hex representation, of course.
HEX:=="313631313631"
Leet:="ELEBELELEBEL"
Sorry, I just don't get it ... Is there another coding overlay?
