[35719] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Thu Mar 15 05:35:40 2001
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:31:34 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010315183134.G31286@ewok.creative.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039CC4@condor.mhsc.com>; from rmeyer@mhsc.com on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 12:25:17AM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> >
> > Because the current DNS has a single contention point, it is very
> > vulnerable. It can be very easily taken over by a large
> > corporate entity.
>
> The let's design a better system.
<TONGUE POSITION="CHEEK">
When its done, can we please move it the hell out of the US?
</TONGUE>
Perhaps we should all shift this to a DNS list?
Adrian
--
Adrian Chadd "The fact you can download a 100 megabyte file
<adrian@creative.net.au> from half way around the world should be viewed
as an accident and not a right."
-- Adrian Chadd and Bill Fumerola
