[35714] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Stuart)
Thu Mar 15 02:41:16 2001
Message-Id: <200103150739.f2F7d8f11430@hi.tech.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2001 23:21:57 PST."
<Pine.LNX.4.04.10103142204410.19400-100000@kitty.kotovnik.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 23:39:08 -0800
From: Stephen Stuart <stuart@mfnx.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Do you see many scandals around people who own cool IP addresses? :)
IIRC, there was an "issue" around the assignment of 16.1.16.1; I don't
think lawyers had been invented back then, so the scope of the scandal
remained relatively small.
(The coolness factor was the binary representation, of course.)
Stephen
