[35646] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Wed Mar 14 07:29:13 2001
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:51:14 +0200 (IST)
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200103132003.f2DK34k08086@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.10_heb2.08.10103141348320.40546-100000@MaX.att.net.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> I fail to see how RFC2826 is in any way "political".Upon careful re-reading
> it boils down to:
>
> If you use one root, everybody agrees what things look like.
>
> If you use multiple roots, what people will see depends on which root they ask.
>
> How is this political?
It isn't, but since these cyber-carpetbaggers have failed on the technical
end to get their way, they figure if they can turn it into a political
issue then they can involve their clueless congressman to jump in and make
all sorts of investigations and subcommittees and perhaps they will end up
with the pseudo-jackpot of a .xxx suffix in their hands.
-Hank
