[35641] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Wed Mar 14 06:15:27 2001
Message-ID: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039CA5@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: "'David R. Conrad'" <david.conrad@nominum.com>,
John Payne <john@sackheads.org>,
"Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
Cc: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>,
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>,
nanog@merit.edu
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 02:48:21 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Well, that's the point ... isn't it? Marketing gets enoiugh of those
requests and maybe they'll tell engineering to install a root zone that
resolves SHOP. Uh oh, maybe that is what everyone's worried about?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David R. Conrad [mailto:david.conrad@nominum.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:12 PM
>
> John,
>
> At 02:04 PM 3/13/2001 -0800, John Payne wrote:
> >If you don't use the alternative roots, you're not affected by their
> >existance...
>
> Except for the folks at help desks who get calls asking why foo.shop
> doesn't work.
>
> Rgds,
> -drc
>
>
