[35639] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Havard Eidnes)
Wed Mar 14 06:03:50 2001
To: mikebat@tmcs.net
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Havard Eidnes <he@nordu.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:12:59 -0800"
<LLEOLJEDPHOFANPCPKOMEEAOCCAA.mikebat@tmcs.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <20010314114217E.he@runit.no>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 11:42:17 +0100
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> > > Because the one root referred to is the USG/ICANN root. It
> > > cannot avoid being political (anymore).
> >
> > Then you must be reading something into the mentioned document
> > that I don't. As far as I can see, nowhere is either USG or
> > ICANN explicitly referred to in that document.
>
> Oh come on, we're not idiots here, what other root could it
> possibly be referring to? You're being intentionally dense.
Well, obviously I disagree. It is my firm opinion that the people
politically opposed to the ICANN/USG/pick-your-DNS-political-enemy
are reading way too much between the lines in this document.
I stand by my claim that the document is first and foremost
technical in nature, and I wish those people claiming otherwise
would actually go back and read the document and cite chapter and
verse.
Regards,
- H=E5vard
