[35602] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Batchelor)
Tue Mar 13 20:52:14 2001
From: "Mike Batchelor" <mikebat@tmcs.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:12:59 -0800
Message-ID: <LLEOLJEDPHOFANPCPKOMEEAOCCAA.mikebat@tmcs.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20010313233358P.he@runit.no>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> > Because the one root referred to is the USG/ICANN root. It
> > cannot avoid being political (anymore).
>
> Then you must be reading something into the mentioned document
> that I don't. As far as I can see, nowhere is either USG or
> ICANN explicitly referred to in that document.
Oh come on, we're not idiots here, what other root could it possibly be
referring to? You're being intentionally dense.
>
> - Håvard
>