|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-ID: <3AAE8D28.C7283D52@senie.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:12:08 -0500 From: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Travis Pugh <tpugh@shore.net> Cc: nanog@merit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu Travis Pugh wrote: > > Not to open up any potential disputes, but has anyone heard what is going > on between UUNet and AT&T on the east coast? We've been seeing this kind > of performance for a week ... standard UUNet NOC response was "it's ATT's > problem, call them" which doesn't do me a whole lot of good since we're > not an ATT customer. I've reported a few problems as an ATT Broadband customer, and gotten nowhere. From the cable modem at my house, a traceroute to www.uu.net goes through a router that introduces a 400ms minimum delay. Traces to ftp.uu.net, in a different netblock, don't incur that delay. It appears there's a problem between these two, and it affects only some netblocks and not others. > > UUNet --> ATT > > 6 POS6-0.BR3.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.24.97) 9.212 ms 9.633 ms 10.363 > ms > 7 137.39.52.74 (137.39.52.74) 9.642 ms 12.967 ms 12.137 ms > 8 gbr3-p50.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.1.122) 418.555 ms 416.419 ms > 419.819 ms > > ATT --> UUNet > > 8 ggr1-p370.attga.ip.att.net (12.123.20.253) [AS 7018] 20 msec 24 msec > 20 msec > 9 att-gw.atl.uu.net (192.205.32.130) [AS 7018] 396 msec 396 msec 392 > msec > 10 179.at-6-0-0.XR1.ATL5.ALTER.NET (152.63.82.190) [AS 701] 388 msec 388 > msec 388 msec > > Thanks. > > -travis -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Senie dts@senie.com Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranth.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |