[35581] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Tue Mar 13 16:34:27 2001
Message-ID: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039C9E@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: "'Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu'" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:54:42 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 12:03 PM
> I fail to see how RFC2826 is in any way "political". Upon
> careful re-reading
> it boils down to:
>
> If you use one root, everybody agrees what things look like.
>
> If you use multiple roots, what people will see depends on
> which root they ask.
>
> How is this political?
By the sheer fact that they included a non-technical value-judgment.
