[35513] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Namespace conflicts
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Henry R. Linneweh)
Sat Mar 10 15:53:09 2001
Message-ID: <3AAA91AD.FCA2494@concentric.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 12:42:21 -0800
From: "Henry R. Linneweh" <linneweh@concentric.net>
Reply-To: linneweh@concentric.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: "'Shawn McMahon'" <smcmahon@eiv.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
UDRP REFERENCE:
http://eon.law.harvard.edu/udrp/library.html
Roeland Meyer wrote:
> Actually, the courts aren't well engaged right now. They've been
> short-circuted by the UDRP. UDRP arbitrators are NOT courts.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shawn McMahon [mailto:smcmahon@eiv.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:16 PM
> > To: nanog@merit.edu
> > Subject: Re: Namespace conflicts
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 02:51:30PM -0800, bob bownes wrote:
> > >
> > > > On the other hand, if my TV let me type in "CNN" and it
> > came back with
> > > > the right channel, that would scale beautifully as long
> > as nobody else
> > > > was dumb enough to name their channel CNN.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Or dumb enough to name it IBM...Therein lies part of the problem.
> >
> > I don't see that it's a problem. First-come first-served worked fine
> > until the courts got involved.
> >
> >
--
Thank you;
|---------------------------------|
| Thinking is a learned process. |
| ICANN member @large |
| Gigabit over IP, ieee 802.17 |
| working group |
| Resilient Packet Transport |
| http://www.luminousnetworks.com |
|---------------------------------|
Henry R. Linneweh
