[35461] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Namespace conflicts
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven M. Bellovin)
Fri Mar 9 10:49:31 2001
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
To: "Bryan C. Andregg" <bandregg@redhat.com>
Cc: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 10:38:55 -0500
Message-Id: <20010309153855.A12CD35C42@berkshire.research.att.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
In message <20010309100228.A2521@redhat.com>, "Bryan C. Andregg" writes:
>
>--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:10:09AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin mailed:
>> In my area of NJ, virtually every town's "obvious" .com domain names were=
>=20
>> grabbed by one of two competing would-be service providers. They had=20
>> absolutely no town-specific content -- but if the town wanted a Web=20
>> site, they had no choice but to deal with these folks. I have no major=
>=20
>> problem with first-come, first-served *productive* use of a domain name,
>> but frankly, that's not where the problem has been. The problem has=20
>> been speculators and cybersquatters.
>
>Uh, why couldn't the town just use <name>.nj.us or whatever the city specif=
>ic
>code was long ago and far way.
They grabbed those, too.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
