[35433] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Thu Mar 8 19:10:31 2001
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 18:49:43 -0500
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010308184943.A10344@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.30.0103090035520.416847-100000@jones.lab.madscience.nl>; from pi@vuurwerk.nl on Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:40:55AM +0100
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:40:55AM +0100, Pim van Riezen wrote:
>=20
> I'd say do away with DNS, let's go back to a voluntary HOSTS.TXT. It's
> either that or Active Directory Hell.
Or stay with what we have. Why is that not a valid option?
HOSTS.TXT certainly isn't, and a single-platform solution certainly isn't.
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6qBqXEcl9bQ0RMt0RAkbYAKC94aTUjIImCMVv3wo2lRnzS7qT2ACg2VTo
guY2G0HkyorqeVckGu09gCk=
=yQsU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--
