[35361] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pim van Riezen)
Wed Mar 7 16:24:48 2001

Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 22:18:04 +0100
From: Pim van Riezen <pi@vuurwerk.nl>
To: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com>
Cc: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>,
	"John A. Tamplin" <jat@liveonthenet.com>,
	Scott Gifford <sgifford@tir.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0103071603120.3610-100000@shell.inch.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.30.0103072216520.381561-100000@jones.lab.madscience.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Charles Sprickman wrote:

>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>
> > Parody and criticism are protected under trademark law(although those
> > rights are being eroded quickly.)
>
> No one has a sense of humor any more.  A lot of folks have had
> <companyname>sucks.com taken away from them due to "trademark violations".

Which brings me to the interesting borderline case:

  companyname.sucks.com

Can WIPO take away hostname records?:)

Pi

-- 
If your telephone company installs a system in the woods with no one around
to see them, do they still get it wrong?
                                           -- Robert Moir in the Monestary




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post