|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:52:53 -0500 From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com> To: nanog@merit.edu Message-ID: <20010226185253.B30590@eiv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="98e8jtXdkpgskNou" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010225205103.029cfeb8@mail.oz.net>; from benb@theriver.com on Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 09:02:46PM -0800 Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu --98e8jtXdkpgskNou Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 09:02:46PM -0800, Ben Browning wrote: >=20 > The only possible reason you could want names, or account names, or=20 > addresses, or copies of my logs, etc would be to initiate civil or crimin= al=20 > proceedings, in which case the subpoena should be a piece of cake. Wow; despite the lengthy discussion in which I've posted at least two messages talking about another possible reason, you've gotten this far in the thread without realizing there was more than one possible reason? This reminds me of the old joke about how you tell something to a blonde with two black eyes. I've already tried to tell you twice, a third time would just waste my time and annoy the pig. --98e8jtXdkpgskNou Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6muxVEcl9bQ0RMt0RAqTeAJ9DcpAVHD6MofjWzaEv6UcKm4SEVgCgy2Gu jbP9lC0nZcfWHItOvVOPluQ= =4lGu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --98e8jtXdkpgskNou--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |