[35034] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: home.nl NOC contact number.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Fri Feb 23 15:33:12 2001
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:07:29 -0500
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010223150729.D25573@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010223144534.A3932@totally.unspeakable.org>; from scott@unspeakable.org on Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:45:34PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:45:34PM -0500, Scott Walker wrote:
>=20
> I all ready tried....
>=20
> response I got was=20
> "Ohh, home.nl, that's a different company completly. So it's not out prob=
lem"
@home hasn't a clue.
I got spam recently that was sent from outside their network, via an open r=
elay
within their network. As a service, I let them know about the open relay.
They told me it wasn't their problem because the sender wasn't their custom=
er.
That's like saying "don't tell me if you see a burglar on my premesis, beca=
use
he obviously doesn't work for us".
I don't care about busting the spammer, morons; I have procmail to filter t=
hat. I
was trying to help YOU with YOUR problem.
--JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6lsMBEcl9bQ0RMt0RApC/AJsGdJIMqGZ741AY5asEg9nUQM97OwCgk6Ta
6hNCkxqDe7me8DmhbeD0838=
=4Nm/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej--
