[35027] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: rfc 1918?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Fri Feb 23 14:43:53 2001
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:40:52 -0500
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010223144052.B25573@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010223022806.A4899@noc.untraceable.net>; from twofsonet@graffiti.com on Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:28:07AM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:28:07AM -0500, Andrew Brown wrote:
>=20
> indeed. i fought with uunet a couple of years ago about this. after
> about a dozen phone calls, countless emails (including a few megabytes
> of packet dumps), and who knows how many people, i finally reached
> someone at uunet who was willing to say "no, we don't filter that
> stuff and no, we aren't going to".
I'm tempted to buy one share of stock, then show up a shareholders' meeting=
and
complain about the (probable) fact that they spend more money arguing with =
people
about this than it would cost them to start filtering it at the borders.
--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6lrzEEcl9bQ0RMt0RAl7CAKDQO1/r4e2n9vWNEcmdnPp+L8hQpgCghvcO
o/CQ/HaWKNSrocpPRX3ZIjM=
=jalB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX--