[34993] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: rfc 1918?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Fri Feb 23 05:15:47 2001
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:13:40 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010223181340.O41037@ewok.creative.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3A959E35.D1886235@ehsco.com>; from ehall@ehsco.com on Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:18:13PM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> RFC1918 addreses cause real problems. They are not supposed to be used. It
> cannot be made much clearer than that. Choosing to ignore the wishes of
> the rest of the Internet community in order to make your own life a little
> bit easier is not a question of free will, it is a matter of
> selfishishness.
>
> Furthermore, if you claim that you have the right to violate spirit and
> intent of Internet BCPs then I certainly have the right to complain about
> it without being labelled as psycho/paranoid/nazi.
Neat. Well, how about we apply your zeal and get packet source address
spoofing sorted out so we at least have a way of tracing broken machines
being used as DoS hosts?
Pretty please? :)
Adrian
--
Adrian Chadd "Romance novel?"
<adrian@creative.net.au> "Girl Porn."
- http://www.sinfest.net/d/20010202.html
