[34957] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: rfc 1918?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric A. Hall)
Thu Feb 22 16:37:02 2001

Message-ID: <3A958313.28E43A71@ehsco.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:22:27 -0800
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Hawkinson <jhawk@bbnplanet.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
	Chris Davis <chris.davis@computerjobs.com>,
	"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



> > You're not crazy, and UUNet should be filtering them.

> There are good reasons to want to get those packets (traceroutes from
> people who have numbered their networks in rfc1918 networks,

That's not a good reason. Nobody should be generating public traffic from
those addresses, "making them work" is not an Internet-friendly decision.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post