[34953] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: rfc 1918?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Feb 22 15:56:35 2001
Message-Id: <200102222054.f1MKsJk29895@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: Chris Davis <chris.davis@computerjobs.com>
Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:38:56 EST."
<9B66343BA96A5D4A9D6FBC00181A747D1B849F@exchange1>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1350287960P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:54:19 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-1350287960P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:38:56 EST, Chris Davis <chris.davis@computerjobs.com> said:
> Does anyone know why I get inbound packets from 10.x.x.x coming from my ISP,
> UUNet? They're just headed for a webserver, so it's not likely that they're
> up to no good.
> This seems to violate rfc 1918. Am I crazy?
You're not crazy, and UUNet should be filtering them.
Most likely, some poor Windows user behind a NAT is leaking the packets
and nobody's filtering them.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_-1350287960P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/16/2000
iQA/AwUBOpV8e3At5Vm009ewEQJFRACdGMaFO4ZS6UtLuDpK/fhmKwJ2Zi0AoLnW
TzG4nSPem8yKUmftjoeb7dbg
=B4zp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1350287960P--
