|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:35:54 -0500 (EST) From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@NorthShoreTechnologies.net> To: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net> Cc: Daniel Golding <dan@netrail.net>, "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <E14UxwV-0000Kj-00@sapphire.noc.gxn.net> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102191735350.27652-100000@amethyst.nstc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Alex Bligh wrote: > > InterNAP has done the tier-0 marketing dance > > So if I buy transit from players like Internap / Opnix & implement > a similar system, am I tier-1, tier--1, or the victim of meaningless > marketing hype? Yes. -- I'm being told I have lost the respect of some of my acquaintances in the anti-spam camp. That's a shame, as these are people I respect, people whose friendship I have enjoyed, in some cases for several years. However, it's not going to change my mind, and I resent the implication by some people that I'm not doing enough to fight spam. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |